Saturday, August 2, 2014
Comedy - It's a funny thing.
Below is a photo of our self inflating balloon gag. This was a great gag in my solo show but when I did it in our Two by Two Show it never got much of a response. So I stopped doing it.
Then we needed a gag with the coat worn by a volunteer from the audience. Now it's one of the best jokes in the show getting 6 or 7 laughs in one minute!
The audience laughs when:
They see a balloon start to inflate out of his pocket.
They realize he doesn't see the balloon inflating from his pocket.
They see Muriel notice the balloon inflating from his pocket. (She freezes.)
They see him finally notice the balloon inflating from his pocket.
They see Muriel just continuing to stare at the balloon inflating from his pocket.
They see her telling him to blow at it and immediately it flies away into the audience.
And it only took me (and our machinist) one year to perfect the mechanism to do this. (Thank You, Marinus!!)
Photo Credit: Domenico Conte
Be sure to check out our website for more photos and videos: www.ScottandMuriel.com
Monday, February 28, 2011
Our Palazzo Experience
But we learned a lot, created some new material, got some big laughs, made new friends for life, and hopefully got quite a few new clients. So yeah, it was good.
Would we do it again? Yes, but not for the same money! ; ) Hopefully now they know what we're worth. And if not, maybe they will when the show opens again in Berlin without us in October.
Best thing? Working with Zahir Circo. These guys jumped into every act and animation of ours and gave 200% every show. We had so much fun with them and can't wait to work with them again. Perhaps together in a theater show...
Worst thing? Unfriendly people. Both in the crew and and some of the guests. Luckily they were the minority but it's amazing how a few bad apples can bring you down so fast. Of course we tried to be nice to everyone but at some point you just give up.
Hardest thing? Having acts of ours get cut and yet scenes that didn't really work were left in. We certanly had enough acts in the show, but it's hard when you feel like you could do more to make the audience's experience that much better. Also that the food service took priority over what we were doing in the audience was hard to accept. That the tables had to be served in a certain order prevented us from doing some hilarious bits for some tables. That was a pity.
What did I learn? Video tape yourself early and often. We didn't until the very end and were shocked by some of the obvious mistakes we we're making. Ok, it was new material... but all the more reason to tape it! Feel a but stupid about that and hopefully learned my lesson.
Also, don't play open cards with management. Their interests are not the same as yours and it's much better to keep things on a strictly business, highly professional level.
Make sure your contract says any shows with an audience are paid. They got a free show from us by calling it the dress rehearsal even though they invited an audience to come watch. (It was made worse by the fact that we were totally not ready, having never done the show once...)
Make friends with the cooks! And everyone else you can! They can make your life there much more enjoyable. Plus I now feel like I have several new friends for life and that's a great feeling.
Any last comments? Put everything you can in the contract: backstage space needed, dressing room space needed, dietary needs, stagehands/technical needs, guest passes/free tickets, drinks needed, parking, who pays for damage, what if one partner is sick, what if one part of your act can't be done, what if you're asked to sing or dance or do something you don't normally do? I would also specify better what they get for the money they're paying. One act = €X, two acts = €Y, one animation = €A, two animations = €B. They you won't feel like you're doing more than you're getting paid for.
Thursday, January 20, 2011
Illusion Logic?
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Password Danger
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Russia
Thursday, December 3, 2009
Welcome. Now hear me rant.
Welcome to my new blog.
Here's my first post:
Roland Henning of WeeklyMagicFailure fame had a blog about Gandalf from Lord of the Rings not doing very much magic in the films (http://weeklymagicfailure.blogspot.com/2009/11/wmf-gandalf-grey-white.html)
I commented that if you imagine that Gandalf was a sort of lesser God, what he does/does not do makes a bit of sense. What would Frodo, Sam, or any of them have learned if Gandalf had simply teleported them to the spot where they could throw the ring in?
Or if he had just done it himself?
What if doing magic is harder, more physically tolling, than simply pointing a wand and saying a word? What if each spell costs you years off your life?
What if learning to do one trick takes years of study and practice (like a good magic routine?) Most magic pros have a repertoire of less than a dozen effects. Why would professional wizards be any different?
The problem as moviegoers is, we’re spoiled. We expect Harry Potters in all our films, with magic going on everywhere, every few seconds.
I agree some more magic would have been better. But I also prefer the wizards in Stephen R Donaldson's brilliant series of Thomas Covenant, the Unbeliever.
Personally I didn't like the Lord of the Rings Books very much. The Hobbit was good. But the other books are so full of names and places that never appeared before, nor ever will again, that reading them is like a slog through waist high wet snow.
The movies are better story telling IMHO.
But this topic also relates to my critique of most magic acts in general. (And manipulation acts in particular...) They're so chock full of tricks that there's not much magic. Little trick after little trick after little trick, some good, some not so good. Filler. Maybe one big good trick at the end.
It’s like a smorgasbord of 'just ok' dishes.
I’d rather have one dish, prepared for me, to my liking, that’s perfectly cooked, perfectly conceived, perfectly served.
If our goal is to create a real experience of magic, is this the way? Show them 50 tricks and hope a couple hit the target?
However it’s not that they do too many tricks. It’s that there’s no focus. There’s too many other things going on. Too many themes. Too much confusion.
Take Losander’s Floating Table. It’s got great focus. Simple, direct. It seems impossible. Now if the magician made himself float, then the spectator, then the audience, that would be a lot of tricks. But they would all fit together.
However the typical magician would pull feather flowers out of the cloth, have cards shoot out the table, and produce doves - lots of doves!
I remember watching Topas (the greatest living German magician) do his manipulation act on TV years ago. I was watching with my (then) non-magician girlfriend. Throughout the whole act she would say, “Saw it.” Or “Missed it.” To her it was a game to see if she could catch the steals or see the moves. Is that the reaction - the thought process - we magicians want our spectators to experience??
My goal is to make them laugh. But having one or two really good effects that blow their minds is important to me as well.
Check out the Donaldson series (and in fact everything he ever wrote) if you like fantasy/sf. He's the best. Together with Orson Scott Card...
Our website can be found at: www.ScottandMuriel.com
